The Homosexual Movement Is Picking Up Steam To Suppress Churches


The elite of LGBT is expediting the prosecution of Christians that refuse to perform same sex marriage to make a point.

Complete submission to their will.

In a War College book by Carl von Clausewitz “On War,” the definition of war is “The use of force to compel your enemy to submit to your will.”

Whether people realize it or not, we are in a Constitutional war over free speech and freedom of religion.

As I have said, the gains given to homosexuals is not enough.

It’s about taking control of true pastors and believers that hold fast to the Biblical prohibition of homosexuality. It’s already settled that those of us that remain true will resist the will of the elite of LGBT.

No amount of force that LGBT has is sufficient to compel us to submit to their will.

They are no match for the Lord Jesus and His Word. They are weak and they know it.

Already in Idaho, a wedding chapel, owned by Christians, was ordered to perform same sex marriages or they face jail time and a $1,000.00 fine.

On Friday, June 26, 2015, the ruling came. On Monday, June 29, 2015 the order to comply came.

If you do not believe that we are about to see what had already happened in Canada come to pass, you got another thought coming.

The article of this story could be read here.

If that is not enough, a lesbian Senator deliberately issued a statement that the First Amendment is next.

Again, if you do not believe what is happening, I pray that you get understanding.

The Constitution Of The United States is under siege by the elite of LGBT and it won’t be long before we might kiss this document goodbye.

The article about the lesbian Senator’s statement could be read here.

A Lesson From Canada Of What’s To Come


My FB friend Virgil, posted an article that spells out what is to come shortly. I thank him for his courage and research to find this article. The picture above is one of many powerfully anointed street preachers across the country.

His name is Jessie.

He and many others, including this author is out on the streets ministering the unadulterated gospel of Jesus Christ to a dying world. We are determined to take advantage of the window of opportunity before it is taken away from us.

And even after the First Amendment dies, we will still be out here on the streets because we were commanded of the Lord to preach the gospel to a lost and sinful world of people.

Jesus said “All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations….”

Jesus didn’t say “Go, while you have the First Amendment…”

Regardless of whether the First Amendment is here or not, we are to preach.

People came to America because of Christian persecution. By putting distance between those that persecuted free speech and religion, they felt safe to practice with out persecution.

My how time flies.

Now, we see that the next step is the removal of the First Amendment and then hard persecution against free speech and the practice of religion, namely Christianity.

Silencing preachers is not going to stop the preaching of preachers.

In fact, it emboldens us to preach more.

There will be some preachers that will quit and defect in the face of persecution. Sadly, they will run from the battle instead of running the battle. But we must be found faithful to the end.

Street preachers are people reachers. We intend to reach as many people with the gospel of Jesus Christ. That’s our burning desire. To see people come to the Lord before they die and go to a burning, tormenting hell.

What happened on June 26, 2015 doesn’t change our assignment.

Never believe the lie from the elite of LGBT.

We already know that it was planned long ago to destroy the First Amendment to silence the preachers, pastors, and true believers.

The gag order was in place during the Johnson administration with 501 (c) 3.

Now they are going to make a drastic change if we are not paying attention.

Because we didn’t pay attention to the 1960’s when prayer was taken away.

Because we didn’t pay attention to 1973 when abortion became legal.

Landmark rulings by the Supreme Court, by the way.

Now because we didn’t pay attention to 2015 when the sin of homosexuality became legal in all fifty states, we will see another landmark ruling hit this country.

The demise of the First Amendment.

While watching an interview on FOX, two men, one from the Republican party and the other from the Democratic National Committee discussed the ramifications of the landmark ruling handed down by the Supreme Court.

The statement was made by the right that the next thing that LGBT will go after are the churches and the pastors.

As quickly as he made that statement, the left said that they weren’t going to go after the pastors and churches because all gay people wanted was to be on equal footing.

Just by the look on his giddy face, you can smell a rat a mile away.

Listen to Jesus in John 8:44 from the Amplified Bible.

“You are of your father, the devil, and it is your will to practice the lusts and gratify the desires [which are characteristic] of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a falsehood, he speaks what is natural to him, for he is a liar [himself] and the father of lies and of all that is false.” 

Jeremiah 17:9 says, “The heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked. Who can know it?”

The deception that was in his answers spells nothing but trouble.

But the Bible says “Fear not! I am with you.”

No matter what they do, the Lord is with the righteous and this is the hour where we will make our stand.

We all know that the First Amendment is next to go.

Take a look at this lesson from Canada.

The legislation against free speech in America was already drafted in the Committees while Democrats were in power in the House and Senate.  But now under Republican rule, will the same thing happen? Nothing surprises me any longer.  Regardless of who’s in power, we know what’s coming.

This article regarding the loss of free speech in Canada was written in April of this year. Prophetic and very accurate. Please read this article here.

Free Speech – Only In America

Islam’s prophet, Mohammad is in the headlines.

In the United States, there’s been an aggressive move to limit free speech.

If you are upset, sometimes you gotta man up and take it.

Verbal abuse is unnecessary, but it is not going to stop. This is not to say that I am respecting other religions above the Lord Jesus Christ. When the Lord Jesus walked the earth, even He was abused by His own people.

John 1:11 “He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him.”

Even worse, His own people crucified Him.

Acts 10:38-39 “…how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power, who went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him. And we are witnesses of all things which He did both in the land of the Jews and in Jerusalem, whom they killed by hanging on a tree.”

Something was said with cartoons and the whole Islamic world is lit up like a fire on the country side. North Korea goes crazy for a movie about their leader and they want to do cyber war.

Sounds like folks are agitated, but many have spoken against the Lord Jesus Christ and yes, we do get upset, but not like the world. If they were really mad, they would probably launch a nuke if they had one.

While I am on this hit parade, I might as well march.

As a street preacher myself, many have approached me and considered the use of a loud speaker to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ offensive, it’s hate language, and they desired for me to turn my speaker in another direction or cease preaching altogether.

A few persons have challenged me to get a sound permit.

Let’s look at the law on free speech and street preaching.


1“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” United States Constitution

2″We have the right to pass out literature, to preach, and to display signs on public areas.” Coates v. Cincinnati 402 US 61, Edwards v. S. Carolina 372 US 299, Furr v. Town of Swansea, F. Supp 1543

3“We have the right to exercise our religion and to speak in all quintessential (ideal) public forums.” Frisby v. Shultz 487 US 474, US v. Grace 461 US 171, 176

4We have a “guaranteed access” to streets, parks, and other “traditional public forum” and mere inconvenience to the government will not outweigh our free speech interest.” Hague v. C.I.O. 307 US 496

5“Our freedom of speech may not be prohibited merely because it offends some listeners.” Cantwell v. Connecticut 310 US 296, Simon & Shuster v. New York State Crime Victims Bd. 502 US 105, N.Y. Ties v. Sullivan 376 US 254

6“A city may not consider the listener’s reactions when permitting free speech activity.” Forsyth County v. The Nationalist Movement, 505 US 123.

7“Hecklers do not have veto power over a speaker’s right of free speech but police must control a crowd rather than arrest the speaker in order to maintain order.” Cox v. Louisiana 379 US 536


9″We have the right to be protected by law enforcement if the crowd is offended by what we are preaching and becomes hostile.” Hedges v W.C.U.S.D. No. 118, et al 9F, 3d 1295

10″Permits are not allowed to be used to restrict a speaker’s right of free expression and permits may not be used as a prior restraint on free speech.” Kunz v. New York 340 US 290

11“A free speech lawsuit is a Federal case and allows us to sue policemen and guards in their official capacity and as individuals.” Freedom Restoration Act Title 42, Section 2000aa.

12“A free speech lawsuit will subject the police and those involved to pay our damages and all of our attorney fees. 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1988

13Thus, the Supreme Court embraced the idea that hate speech is permissible unless it will lead to imminent hate violence.

1 Hate speech is, outside the law, speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of e.g. race, religion, gender, disability, or sexual orientation.[1][2]

2In law, hate speech is any speech, gesture or conduct, writing, or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group.

No one has a problem when loud speakers are used when the president of the United States shows up inside or outside to be heard by the people. No one has a problem when you go to a sports arena and hear the music. No one has a problem when you stand outside and hear the music blasting from cars.

But there is a problem when a preacher with a loud speaker is on the street corner, preaching the Word of God.

Folks, you can’t have it both ways.

Every one is a sinner so there is no special class of people to discriminate against in this category. Specified sins that are preached about in the Bible is regard to sinful preferences of sinners.

You are what you do and you do what you are.

If you are an adulterer, then the Scriptures are clear. It’s not hate speech. It’s preaching the Word of God that adultery is a sin. If you are a homosexual, the the Scriptures are clear. It’s not hate speech. It’s preaching the Word of God that homosexuality is a sin.

You have the right to disagree or repent. You make the choice as to what you want to do. Neither God nor any preacher has the power to stop you from sinning against God. But you will stop sinning one day. If you repent, that’s good. If you do not repent, that’s bad.

“For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.”

Romans 6:23

Now when it comes to sexual orientation (another lie of the devil and his children), sinners want a special exemption category so that they would be protected from the undeniably clear statement of the Word of God that…..

“All have sinned and come short of the glory of God.” Romans 3:23

And Romans 5:12 says, “Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned —”

When it comes to “religion,” they want to be left alone too.

Especially Islam.

If you speak against Mohammad, you will be killed.

Many people use the name of the Lord is vain every day. No other name is used as a cuss word more than the Lord God, and Jesus Christ.

But look at what the Lord Jesus said in Matthew 12:31-32.

“Therefore I say to you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven men. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.”

If what is being said about a dead prophet is offensive, why not take the high road and let the dead prophet fight for himself and annihilate all who dare blaspheme him?

A friend of mine emailed to me the following….


Journalism dean: Free speech doesn’t protect offensive images of Mohammad via The College Fix

Free speech attorney says scholar is way off the markDeWayne Wickham, dean and distinguished professor of journalism at Morgan State University, published an editorial this week in USA Today that essentially argues free speech rights should not and do not give people the right to make fun of Mohammad.He argues that Charlie Hebedo, in its latest cartoon image of Mohammed, has “gone too far.”  The “offensive depiction of Mohammed” should not constitute free speech, the journalism professor suggested.The College Fix reached out to Wickham via email to confirm whether he was suggesting that the First Amendment does not protect insulting Mohammad. He replied that interpretation was incorrect but did not elaborate, nor respond to follow-up emails.


The image he referenced in his op-ed appeared on the cover of Charlie Hebedo only days after the attack on its office in Paris earlier this month, when radical Islamists killed 12 people. The image shows the prophet crying under a headline: “All is Forgiven.”Wickham suggested in his op-ed that the Charlie Hebedo cartoon is to blame for several violent riots that have occurred in the Arab world following its release. He then proceeded to call for broad limits on free speech, basing his argument in his understandings of U.S. Supreme Court rulings, writing that:

… given the possible ripple effects of Charlie Hebdo‘s mistreatment of Islam’s most sacred religious figure, at least people in this country should understand the limits America’s highest court has placed on free speech.

In 1919, the Supreme Court ruled speech that presents a “clear and present danger” is not protected by the First Amendment. Crying “fire” in a quiet, uninhabited place is one thing, the court said. But “the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic.”

Twenty-two years later, the Supreme Court ruled that forms of expression that “inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace” are fighting words that are not protected by the First Amendment. …

Ari Cohn, a free speech lawyer at The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, told The College Fix in an email that Wickham’s analysis of free speech “misses the mark in several ways.”

“The ‘clear and present danger’ test he cites comes from an early 20th century wartime case holding that voicing opposition to conscription could be prosecuted as an attempt to obstruct the draft,” Cohn said.

Notably, Wickham also fails to mention Brandenburg v. Ohio in which the court clarified “clear and present danger” by establishing an imminent lawless action test. It set a precedent that the state cannot ban speech unless the speaker intends to incite a violation of the law that is both imminent and likely.

Cohn said the satirical cartoonists at Charlie Hebedo “did not advocate, and could not reasonably be interpreted as advocating, for anyone to break the law. They were nothing more than social commentary.”

Wickham also references Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, in which the Supreme Court defined “fighting words,” which is a type of unprotected speech.

But characterizing the satirical cartoon of Mohammed as “fighting words” is also inaccurate, according to Cohn. He said “fighting words” are “an extremely narrow category of speech limited to abusive epithets spoken face-to-face to a particular individual, which would tend to provoke an immediate violent response.”

Wickham concluded his editorial by arguing that because the satirical cartoons incite violence in the Arab world, they push “Charlie Hebedo’s free speech claim beyond the limits of the endurable.”

Using similar logic, Cohn noted, one could conclude “that the civil rights advocacy of the 1950s and 1960s was not protected by the First Amendment…This advocacy could, would, and did lead directly to violent and heinous acts of reprisal and intimidation by groups like the Ku Klux Klan and other segregationists. The irony of Wickham’s article being published on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day is breathtaking and inescapable.”

Cohn was particularly troubled by Wickham’s understanding of free speech and the role of the press, given his standing in academics.

“If student journalists are being taught that their First Amendment rights are or should be limited by how others might react to their work, the profession is in significant trouble,” he said.

Prior to coming to Morgan State University, Wickham was scholar-in-residence and distinguished professor of journalism at Delaware State University, distinguished visiting professor at the University of Pennsylvania, and distinguished professor of journalism and chair of the Department of Journalism and Mass Communication at North Carolina A&T State University.

College Fix contributor Alexandra Zimmern is recent graduate of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

IMAGES: Internet screenshots

Now, if you teach in the United States something that is unconstitutional, i.e. suppress free speech, perhaps you need a one way ticket to another country.

Because I am a US Navy veteran, here, in the United States, as long as this constitution is adhered to, upheld, preserved, protected, and defended with American blood, sweat, and tears, your call to suppress free speech against Islam and Mohammad falls on deaf ears.


First Amendment And Abortion In Massachusetts

IMG_0820Just a few weeks ago, the SCOTUS struck down the 35 foot buffer zone in the state of Massachusetts to prohibit abortion protesters from exercising free speech rights.

It was a big win against the murderers of innocent children. The sin of adultery and fornication is responsible for 56 million deaths of children because of inconvenience. This is the side that the media will not publish.

After watching MSNBC do a segment on this new law to circumvent the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision to uphold free speech at the abortion murder mills, it is clear that the evil empire has emerged in the United States. The Soviet Union stayed in the dark for 70 years. As soon as they freed themselves from the demonic oppression of totalitarianism, the United States picked up where they left off.

To silence free speech is the way to impose no tolerance on righteousness.


“For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil.”

The billions of dollars spent to kill children in the womb is the only reason why abortionist seeks to suppress the truth so that the gullible would believe the lie.

Murder is indefensible.

Take a good look at the picture above.

That was a child whose life was deliberately taken. It’s called child sacrifice to appease the sin of fornication and or adultery.

At Prevailing Word Ministries, we seek to cut off any form of connections where the tentacles of abortion exist.

Girl Scouts have been used to sell cookies and portions of their proceeds go to Klanned Abortionhood.

It is in the CDC and other reliable sources that the statistics of abortion paint a true picture that they seek to silence.

It is left up to all abolition of abortion proponents to reveal the real dark world of abortion. As an abolitionist, we do not seek to compromise or accept policies that clearly fall short of the goal of abolishing abortion.

Unconditional cessation and surrender.

Nothing less.

The nature of man is described in Jeremiah 17:9, The heart of man is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked. Who can know it?”

Man will create laws to continue sin at any cost.

Man was made in the image of God and when we deliberately take the life of any human being, we are destroying the image of God.

Genesis 9:6-7 says “Whoever sheds man’s blood, by man his blood shall be shed; For in the image of God He made man. And as for you, be fruitful and multiply; Bring forth abundantly in the earth and multiply in it.”

No where in this Scripture do we see the Lord order man to decrease. God deliberately intended man to multiply, not subtract. Furthermore, the Lord does not advocate the deliberate taking of a life. Instead, man seeks to circumvent any attempt to tell the truth.

Any buffer zone is a clear and present danger to free speech.

The current perilous course that this, and other abortion proponent nations is on, is a direct defiant act of man of the known will of God.

If a politician supports this buffer zone, call out their name in the pulpit and tell the people that this politician threatens free speech. Vote for politicians that will stand for free speech and is against abortion on demand.

Based on a false fear, Massachusetts is trying to prevent free speech against mass murder because they claim that they are afraid someone would kill an abortionist or impede a woman from getting an abortion. The real fear is that the Word of God would be preached that murder is murder.

Just because man makes the murder of a child in the womb legal, it doesn’t make it moral.

This is what proponents of murder on demand fear.

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” the late Dr. Martin Luther King once said.

The buffer zone is an injustice to the people that preach the truth that abortion is murder on demand.

It is an injustice when people assume office to impose the will of the elite on the will of the poor. It is an injustice when the people are prohibited from exercising free speech to preach the Word of God to save a life. There are plenty of laws in the books regarding protecting people from assault and bodily harm. If a person has the intent to do bodily harm, will a white line save a person? Will a buffer zone prevent physical harm?

The Klanned Abortionhood elite is driving politics to circumvent the constitution because of the effective preaching of the Word of God.

If the Bible was ineffective or posed no real threat, Massachusetts wouldn’t bother with applying any buffer zone, but because the Word of God is effective, and they know it, they, in fear errect an unconstitutional buffer zone.

They fear that the truth would get to the people. That’s why the news media will never allow the truth to be placed in the newspapers, be interviewed without spin on the news channels, or allowed to stand in places where the truth would be known. This is the plan of the devil. The devil is afraid of truth, and the people of the devil is afraid of the truth.

On the other hand, the truth does get out but in less prominent news establishments. This shows us that there is a deliberate intent to suppress the truth.


Because people fear the truth. Truth brings conviction and a realization of the true intent of abortion.

That’s why “agitation” signs is one of the best ways to get into the minds of people of what “pro-choice” is really about.

Please go to

Continue reading “First Amendment And Abortion In Massachusetts”

%d bloggers like this: